Security & cryptography

Chiplet Admission Firewall

Chiplet admission, quarantine and trust-boundary engine

Executed digital evidence
Request evaluation
ChiSecurity & cryptography
THE TECHNICAL ROLE

A clear integration boundary.

Chiplet Admission Firewall provides the documented chiplet admission, quarantine and trust-boundary engine responsibility: Chiplet admission, quarantine and trust-boundary engine Evaluate the exact IP-2014 implementation and confirm its integration contract before using it inside the target design.

01

RTL exists

02

43/0 simulation

03

BMC + induction proved

04

generic synthesis top reported at 25,644 cells. Cross-links GSH/GUL/GSCP security without replacing them

FUNCTION AT A GLANCE

Chiplet Admission Firewall

01

RTL exists

02

43/0 simulation

03

BMC + induction proved

04

generic synthesis top reported at 25,644 cells. Cross-links GSH/GUL/GSCP security without replacing them

Documented function grouping, not a wiring diagram, interface contract or physical layout. Confirm the selected release before integration.

Explore related engineering tasks ↗
TECHNICAL OVERVIEW

The details matter.

Download the product brief
Canonical identity
IP-2014
Native implementation identity
IP-2014
Documented responsibility
Chiplet admission, quarantine and trust-boundary engine
Recorded evidence class
Executed digital evidence
Interface and physical parameters
Bound to the selected source/configuration; not inferred from name or family.
Executed digital evidence

Know the release.
Know what it establishes.

RTL exists; 43/0 simulation; BMC + induction proved; generic synthesis top reported at 25,644 cells. Cross-links GSH/GUL/GSCP security without replacing them.

Source basis: Bible v7.42 VERIFIED V29, IP-2014; 68.1 Standalone synthesized IP (table 723, row 4).. This is a controlled-portfolio summary, not a fresh execution of the chip qualification flow.

Release-specific qualification

Evidence shown is the Bible record for this canonical implementation, not a fresh tool rerun. External foundry acceptance, silicon measurements, standards certification and unlisted interface/physical parameters are not inferred. Exact delivery and rights are agreed before licensing.

Canonical record: RTL + SIMULATION + FORMAL INDUCTION + GENERIC SYNTHESIS EVIDENCED — no physical implementation or silicon evidence.

A PATH THAT FITS THE PROJECT

Build with Chiplet Admission Firewall.

Technical scope, rights, support and release configuration are agreed before delivery.

evaluation

Review the exact recorded implementation and agreed test scope

Inspect the named release and establish technical fit.

Discuss this scope
production

Named-design rights for the agreed qualified release

Agree deployment or design rights, deliverables and support.

Discuss this scope
custom

Target integration, verification or physical qualification

Define the customer-specific work and acceptance criteria.

Discuss this scope

Keep exploring.

Security & cryptography

ORAX Trust FW-100

Trust/security product

Executed digital evidence
IP-2000 · Executed digital evidence

Your next big idea.
Let’s build it together.

Start with a chip, a software release or a single IP block.

CANONICAL EVIDENCE RECORD · IP-2014

Executed digital evidence

Executed digital verification and/or synthesis are recorded for this implementation; physical qualification is a separate gate.

Source: Bible 7.42 VERIFIED V29 · 68.1 Standalone synthesized IP · table 723, row 4.

Record integrity and qualification boundary

b9bef832b06b362e66d59e0c81a5ee0b2cd66b898ed6e405e9529136d248971a

Evidence ranking for evaluation prioritization; not a probability or certification.

How evidence priority is determined ↗